Discuss  questions given below.

Moral subjectivism makes moral beliefs no more than personal preferences, similar to whether you like or dislike asparagus, grits, or okra. It takes the position that these are just personal beliefs and apply to the believer. The believer may disapprove of the actions of others, but that just means they don’t like what other people do. When you like grits and I do not, we are not disagreeing. We just have different preferences.

Question: does moral subjectivism make any sense at all? Is it any different from just denying that there is such a thing as morality?

Moral anti-realism does explicity deny there any any such thing as morality. It says nothing is actually right or wrong, though its defenders are happy to say that people in a society can set up a bunch of rules if they want to, as a way to make their society run more smoothly.

Question: Are you tempted to defend or criticize moral anti-realism? What reasons could be given to support it or attack it?

Bonus points: Discuss Trying Out One’s New Sword by MARY MIDGLEY, moral isolationism, and her argument against it.

  Do you need high quality Custom Essay Writing Services?